Thursday, February 26, 2009

Another John Stewart comedy masterstroke.


Perhaps it's time, evolutionary economists argue, to focus less on finding the best way to foresee the economic future and more on explaining how the economy works. That discovery may lie in modeling the economy as a complex system based upon the three core concepts of Darwinism: variation, selection, and inheritance. "We're not saying it's identical. We're not saying the mechanisms are the same," Hodgson says. "The key issue is whether there is an ontological similarity in terms of the structure of reality that crosses the two domains, that's similar in biology and similar in the economic sphere."

Jonathan Hafetz, a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union who has represented several detainees, describes the government's position on Bagram and Guantánamo as a distinction without a difference, and worries that by maintaining Bagram as a legal black hole for detainees, the Obama administration will continue to hold terror suspects indefinitely without trial, even if Gitmo is closed. "The fact is that since this first Supreme Court ruling upholding Gitmo detainee's access to habeas corpus," Hafetz explains, "the administration stopped bringing people to Guantánamo and started bringing them to Bagram. The population skyrocketed."

The above article (written by Adam Serwer for "The American Prospect") gives the impression that Obama will review all the Bush terror/torture policies and eventually reverse the many particularly egregious ones. The article also comes to the general conclusion that this will take time. Fair enough. But the Bush policies were so ghastly, I am going to continue to follow Obama's tract fairly closely in addition to his Green agenda (see the below post on his public support of "clean coal"). I generally support Obama and agree with the overall direction he is taking the country in his albeit short tenure, but I dislike the tendency I see in some of his supporters to not think critically of his policies.

If you don't understand why these issues are imperative for the future of this country and want to know more about the Bush admin. torture history... watch these movies. I've posted about them before. They are both awesome in a horrible way... or horrible in an awesome way.. yea.. the second one.


Friday, February 13, 2009

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

In a new book, 'The Gamble', to be published Tuesday, Washington Post reporter Tom Ricks confirms an earlier report that in his initial encounter with Petraeus in Baghdad last July, Obama had made no effort to hide his sharp disagreement with the general's views. Obama interrupted a lecture by Petraeus, according to Ricks, and made it clear that, as president, he would need to take a broader strategic view of the issue than that of the commander in Iraq.

Ricks, who interviewed Petraeus about the meeting, writes that Obama's remarks "likely insulted Petraeus, who justly prides himself on his ability to do just that..." That strongly implies that Petraeus expressed some irritation at Obama over the incident to Ricks.

On top of the interest of Petraeus and other senior officers in keeping U.S. troops in Iraq for as long as possible, Petraeus has personal political interests at stake in the struggle over Iraq policy. He has been widely regarded as a possible Republican Presidential candidate in 2012.

Petraeus evidently believed the White House was promoting a story that made him look like the loser at the Jan. 21 meeting. "I imagine the White House is not too happy that this information is out there," said the military source, referring to the Petraeus account he had provided to IPS.

Obama is obviously treading warily in handling Petraeus. His concern about Petraeus's political ambitions may have been a factor in the decision to bring four-star Marine Corps Gen. James Jones in as his national security adviser.

"I've been told by a couple of people that one of the reasons for Jones being chosen was to have him there as a four-star to counter Petraeus," says one Congressional source.

Another really interesting NOVA special.


This NOVA special details the failure of the NSA to communicate with the FBI and CIA pre 9/11. It also briefly probes the question of FISA/warrant-less wiretapping without editorializing too much.

Nova special on fractals

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

For love of the Limb-bough